LTK: CEO says 2025 made algorithms eclipse followings

LTK CEO flags a creator-economy turning point

LTK Chief Executive Amber Venz Box says 2025 marked the moment algorithms decisively overtook follower counts as the primary driver of visibility online, a shift that could reshape how creators, retailers, and platforms measure influence and allocate marketing budgets.

“I think that 2025 was the year where the algorithm completely took over, so followings stopped mattering entirely,” Amber Venz Box said, describing what she views as a step-change in how content is distributed and discovered across major social platforms.

From follower graphs to algorithmic distribution

For much of the last decade, follower totals served as a shorthand for reach and influence. Brands often used those numbers to decide who received sponsorships, affiliate partnerships, and product seeding. But the rise of algorithmically curated feeds—where content is recommended based on predicted engagement rather than a user’s explicit subscriptions—has steadily weakened that model.

Algorithmic ranking has become the dominant gatekeeper: it can elevate a post from a small account into mass distribution, or limit exposure for large creators when their content fails to hit engagement signals. In practical terms, the value of a follower count can erode if a platform’s feed prioritizes watch time, saves, shares, and other behavioral indicators over the identity of the publisher.

Why the shift matters for brands and budgets

LTK, best known for powering affiliate-driven social commerce and creator monetization, sits at the intersection of creators and retail marketing. A world in which followings “stopped mattering” would force advertisers to rethink how they evaluate creator partnerships.

Instead of buying access to a creator’s audience, brands increasingly need to buy performance—content that reliably triggers distribution and conversions. That can push campaigns toward:

  • Performance-based compensation tied to sales or measurable actions rather than flat fees justified by follower size.
  • More emphasis on creative testing, where multiple content variations are deployed to see what the algorithm amplifies.
  • Greater reliance on first-party data and trackable links to validate outcomes beyond views and likes.

The implication is that creator marketing may start to resemble paid media buying, with iterative optimization and analytics taking precedence over celebrity-style endorsements.

What it means for creators: reach is less predictable

For creators, the algorithm-first era can be both an opportunity and a risk. On one hand, it lowers the barrier to breakout growth because content can travel widely without a massive follower base. On the other, it makes earnings and reach more volatile, since distribution can fluctuate based on platform changes and shifting engagement patterns.

Amber Venz Box’s comment underscores an emerging reality: creators may need to diversify where they build their audience and how they monetize. If followers are no longer a reliable proxy for reach, creators could prioritize:

  • Building owned channels such as email lists, websites, and community groups.
  • Strengthening commerce and affiliate revenue streams less dependent on platform distribution.
  • Producing content optimized for discovery rather than only serving existing fans.

Platforms gain power—along with scrutiny

As recommendation systems become the main route to visibility, platforms gain greater control over who is seen and who is not. That concentration of power can increase scrutiny from creators and advertisers alike, especially when algorithm changes lead to sudden drops in traffic or sales.

In this environment, transparency becomes a business issue. Brands want predictable returns, and creators want stable livelihoods. Yet recommendation systems are often opaque, designed to maximize engagement and retention rather than provide consistent distribution. The result is a marketplace where stakeholders must adapt quickly, monitor performance closely, and hedge against platform risk.

LTK’s vantage point in social commerce

LTK has long positioned itself as infrastructure for creators to monetize through affiliate links and brand partnerships. If follower counts are losing relevance, tools that connect content to measurable outcomes—clicks, purchases, and repeat customers—can become more valuable.

That shift may also encourage brands to broaden the creator pool they work with. If the algorithm can surface effective content from smaller accounts, marketers can diversify away from a handful of high-cost influencers and toward a portfolio approach that emphasizes conversion efficiency.

What to watch next

Algorithm-driven discovery is not new, but Amber Venz Box’s framing suggests the industry is reaching a tipping point where the old metrics—followers, impressions, and broad reach—carry less weight than performance and adaptability.

In the months ahead, marketers and creators will likely focus on better attribution, more resilient revenue models, and creative strategies designed for recommendation engines. If 2025 is indeed the year “the algorithm completely took over,” the next phase of the creator economy will be defined by who can turn unpredictable distribution into consistent business results.

Share: X Facebook LinkedIn WhatsApp
Share your love